This info-letter is the fourth entry of our series on drycleaning operations, their impact on the environment and ensuing hurdles they pose in real estate transactions.
The previous entry can be viewed here.
Although
much of the drycleaning solvent being used today is delivered via
closed-loop systems, historically drycleaning solvent has been
delivered in drums and by tank trucks.

Some drycleaning wholesale supply facilities receive solvent deliveries via railroad tank cars.

Numerous instances of solvent discharges, associated with these deliveries, have been documented including:
-
Discharge of solvent during transfer from railroad tank car
-
Discharge of solvent when delivery hose uncoupled from tank truck
-
Overfilling of solvent storage tanks
-
Discharge of solvent to facility floor or ground when delivery hose is reeled in
-
Discharge of solvent from drums dropped during delivery
-
Discharge
of solvent when withdrawing solvent from an above-ground storage tank
or transferring solvent to a drycleaning machine
-
Discharge of solvent while filling drycleaning machine and from overfilling machine
Due
primarily to the industry conversion to more efficient drycleaning
machines, PCE use by drycleaners in the United States has dramatically
declined. A survey found that PCE use by drycleaners in the
United States in 2001 was 52 million pounds compared to 260 million
pounds used in 1985. PCE use has been reduced by 72% by drycleaners in
the last ten years.
Since
today's fourth and fifth generation drycleaning machines are more
efficient, they use much less solvent and therefore, much less solvent
is stored at drycleaning facilities.
Most facilities store drycleaning solvent in the tanks located at the base of the drycleaning machine.

In
the past, additional solvent was often stored in tanks, primarily
aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) for PCE and both aboveground and
underground storage tanks (USTs) for petroleum solvents. There have
been solvent discharges associated with these storage tanks from leaks
(valves, flowlines and tanks) and from spills (during both tank filling
and solvent withdrawal).

A
study of reported solvent leaks, spills and discharges at 334
drycleaning facilities and 14 drycleaning wholesale supply facilities
located in Florida found that the largest average solvent spill volumes
were associated with solvent transfer and storage.
Approximately
20.9% of the solvent and solvent-contaminated waste discharges reported
in the Florida study were due to equipment operation problems including
still boilovers, clothing caught in the machine door, loose cartridge
filter housings, overflow of water separator, and open valves.
The
largest number of reported spills/discharges (39.2%) were associated
with equipment failure, including leaking gaskets, seals, valves,
ruptured hoses, failed couplings, and equipment corrosion.

The
Florida study found that 13.8% of the reported solvent/solvent waste
discharges were associated with drycleaning machine/equipment
maintenance. This includes spills associated with filter changes, still
cleanouts, servicing of the solvent pump and button trap cleanouts.
(The information in this newsletter has been gleaned from an EPA sponsored site http://www.drycleancoalition.org and enhanced with pictures obtained from the Web.)